 |
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Retaining Structures
|
|
|
Placement of geofoam behind retaining structures and below-grade walls can
offer advantages of reduced lateral pressure, lower settlements, improved water proofing and
better insulation. The central concept in using geofoam as a retaining structure
backfill is to substitute as much of the soil in the active or at rest wedge with
geofoam to the extent desired. The at rest wedge would imply all soil above a stable free
standing slope or stepped configuration for the soil in question. Since the
geofoam density is low, vertical stresses that develop behind the retaining wall or abutment
will be much less than for comparable aggregate backfill. This would imply reduced
settlements and especially step settlements such as between a bridge deck and an approach
fill. If indeed step settlements are desired to be minimized, the geofoam fill configuration
can be made to resemble half of an inverted trapezoid. The retaining structure would be
designed for the expected lateral pressure transmitted by the geofoam fill which can be
zero. The transition zone between the geofoam and soil should be free-draining. Adequate
subdrain should be provided to prevent development of hydrostatic pressure and
buoyancy. The finished grade behind the retaining structure can be developed with or
without a load distribution slab or plastic sheeting cover above the top surface of the
geofoam, as desired. An application scheme for a retaining wall or abutment backfill is shown
below.
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
NRRL, (1992), "Expanded Polystyrene Used in Road Embankments", Oslo, Norway,
September 1992
|
|
Negussey and Sun (1996), "Reducing Lateral Pressure by Geofoam (EPS) Substitution"
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|